![]() In this sense, and with its 7-second loading time, BlueStacks 5 still stands out as being around 30% faster than its predecessor. Once again, the difference is significant: BlueStacks 4 was slower than its more recent counterpart, taking 10 seconds to load into the training room. Regrettably, loading screens are still mostly inevitable, so let’s see how both versions of our emulator measure up in this regard: ![]() Nevertheless, even big games like this one do not pose any issues for BlueStacks as our Android app player can easily run it and give you the best experience when playing them on PC. ![]() And even though mobile games are on the lighter side of things, compared to their PC and console counterparts, titles like Free Fire can be a bit heavier, considering that they have lots of assets and elements to load. What’s the very first thing you see when you first launch a game? The splash and loading screens, of course! And while these loading sections are inevitable, since the games have to load their assets into the device’s RAM before running, the efficiency of the app and the hardware it’s running on can affect the time it takes to load the game on any given device. ![]() With that being said, let’s get started! Loading Times And by the time you’re done reading, you’ll realize why you should move BlueStacks 5 if you want the best experience with Free Fire on PC. We’ll be examining the popular mobile battle royale on both versions of BlueStacks, and comparing their boot times, in-game performance, the keymapping features and usability, and their resource consumption while playing the game. And in this particular article, we’ll be comparing how both of these emulators fare in relation to playing Garena Free Fire on PC. But we’re not here to simply talk about how BlueStacks 5 offers a better experience than BlueStacks 4 we’re here to show you concrete results. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |